The Enlightenment was an era of intellectual importance. It was during this period that intellectual thinking flourished as compared to previous periods and it was this large growth in people’s insight that led to an analysis of society and ultimately the criticism of society. Some of the thinkers of the era stressed the perverse nature of man like Moliere. Rousseau claimed materialism destroys friendships and bonds, leading to jealousy and suspicion. Bayle supported a separation church and science, faith and reason, under the pretext that God was incomprehensible. However, others took a more constructive stance and noted the somewhat flawed structures of their societies. Voltaire for example stressed the importance of civil rights, which he believed his society lacked. His ideas revolved around free practice of religion, free trade, and separation of church and state. Montesquieu criticized that his society lacked separation of powers, a more democratic government. Locke wrote that government and its people had a social contract and that government existed mainly for the people, quite contrary to the monarchies established in Europe. These thinker’s ideas of society, although radical at the time, established some sort of standard that future generations like the Founding Fathers used for their governments. Their ideas were spread by their writings. At some point during this era, the Industrial Revolution occurred, leading to mass production of books and other literary forms. Through the establishment of structures and places, like coffee houses, their ideas spread, making their criticism very powerful against the institutions they denounced.
DIRECTIONS: Hi! So you're ready to post your "synthesis question" answer and to respond to others? There is only "ONE RULE" to follow: Once you are the first responder to ONE "synthesis question" answer posting, you may respond to as many other postings as you want, but never again in the position of first responder until you begin researching the next era. Check our humanities interchange website for time frames, due dates, etc. Again, may the blog be with you.

Monday, December 12, 2011
Sunday, December 11, 2011
Asher.P1.T1 - Enlightenment Synthesis Question
Whereas the Renaissance era was the age in which ideas of science and individualism only began to bud, the Enlightenment era became the cultural movement where reason and reform flourished and blossomed. During the Enlightenment era, societal woes became a concern and philosophers, writers, and intellectuals sprouted across Europe to express their individual opinions on such issues and how to address them.
Philosophers played a large part in building the sense of reason during the Restoration era, and notable players included John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Voltaire. John Locke, often known as the “Father of Liberalism”, became known not only for his work during the Enlightenment period but a guide for the many other intellectual thinkers who follow him. His work on Two Treatises of Government became a framework for a theory of civil society and was later used by our Founding Fathers as the structure of American government. Locke highlighted the idea that any government unjust to its people can be overthrown, and a separation of powers in government would also stop man’s natural tendencies to be greedy. His social criticism against the British society of the time inspired other philosophers, including Rousseau. Rousseau, however, disagreed with Locke and stated that man was not greedy, but instead a moral figure. Rousseau insisted that the people should be the one to legislate, and that class distinctions would soon disappear. Voltaire, on the other hand, advocated for radical social reform by criticizing the society’s restrictions on freedom. Voltaire believed in the separation of church and state as well as the freedom of religion. These glaring remarks contrasted against previous sentiments of how churches should be revered.
The Enlightenment era sparked a collection of individuals who fought for the people’s rights and encouraged reform in the relatively unchanged society. Locke, Rousseau, and Voltaire, among many others, became the forefront for rights that many countries now protect.
- Freddy Tsao, Andy Kang, David Lee, Michael Amini
Asher.P4.T8.Enlightenment
Clair Fuller
Laurel Kitada
Alex Tranquada
Jodi Shou
Team 8/Team Dragon
December 7, 2011
Asher, Period 4
The Enlightenment of the mid-1600s to the mid-1700s centered strongly on rationale and reason, prompting focused criticism of the philosophies of previous literary and artistic periods. Religious and other 'sentimental' doctrines were rejected, replaced by emphasis on logic. Rising in response to this paradigm shift, a revival of critical writing swept Europe. A certain form of social and intellectual criticism became the genre of 'satire', exemplified in plays, novels, and essays. Notable among the Enlightenment satirists were Voltaire, Jonathan Swift, Alexander Pope, John Arbuthnot, and Robert Harley. Many of these writers were members of the Scriblerus Club, and their perception of the previous periods they satirized as "tedious, narrow- minded, and pedantic" accurately sums up the attitudes of the Enlightenment satirists as a general collective. Wit, irony and sarcasm became the weapons of the satirists; extended sarcasm, such as in Swift's "A Modest Proposal", argued effectively for one point by seeming to argue for its opposite. Extreme language and symbolism was also used to effect, for example, in Pope's "The Rape of the Lock". Though humor was often included, the use of hyperbole, analogy, and antithesis to juxtapose two views made satire stinging. In particular, the relationship-centric hierarchy of artists and patrons, present in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, stood in contrast to the sensible, empirical nature of the developing Enlightenment societal structure, and was sharply criticized by the satirists. By employing devices meant to disparage, Swift, Pope, and their fellow writers made laughable the mentalities of those earlier periods.
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Enlightenment Synthesis Ash.P4.T5
The valued social hierarchy and influence of those that were born into wealth and power were criticized in the Restoration era, for such values were viewed as shallow and hypocritical by Enlightenment thinkers. During the Medieval and Renaissance eras, those that were born into families that yielded great authority and riches over other citizens of the nation generally maintained that power. Royalty and clergy reigned at the top of the social hierarchy, and residing at the bottom were the workers, traders, and craftsmen. Essays, plays, novels and other literature satirized those at the apex of the hierarchy. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a writer of the Restoration era, expressed his indignant views of the most powerful citizens as he exposed their lack of care for the lower class. In his book, Of the Social Contract, Rousseau wrote, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.” Although civil liberties such as a right to “life, liberty, and property,” were emphasized by the “great thinkers” like John Locke of the Enlightenment era, Rousseau points out that man is still bound by the restrictions of the social hierarchy. Rousseau contradicts the traditional ways of ruling by stating that men must first be free; no slavery should be in existence. Only then will one be able to enter into the “Social Contract” where political authority is determined. In his novel and other writings, he satirizes the fact that the elite sustained their power over others through specific tactics focused on targeting the less powerful and maintaining the wealth and power within their own family. Also, John Locke played a key role in founding the Enlightenment movement by establishing a foundation of rationality and freedom. He believed in democratic philosophies where majority rules, not simply the few with the most power. Locke, like Rousseau, expresses his social criticism of the superficial and hypocritical values of the people born into wealth and power through his works of literature and political writings.
Friday, December 9, 2011
Wylie Period 1 Team 5 (Destinee)
In the Age of Enlightenment, people's ideals were being pushed from elementary to secondary, meaning they took the knowledge and culture they had cultivated in the Renaissance and expanded on these ideals. Past ages had been the basis of the progress made in the Restoration era, progress in science, art, and reasoning alike. One great thinker, by the name of John Locke challenged the Renaissance values of reputation and patronage. Locke believed that people are naturally free and have equal rights when it comes to liberty, property, and actions. This goes against all Renaissance ideals concerning people's place in society and class. Locke believed you shouldn't be constrained in this way. Writers criticized past social norms including the German writer Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, who is considered one of the founding fathers of modern literature. He was a pioneer in the way that he expressed his ideas: mainly those concerning human nature and the way in which people behave. Through these writers and thinkers we are given a look into the way people's ideals were developing and becoming more complex.
Evelyn Ashleigh, Nick Hudson, Bennett Kopperud, Anne Kitchens
Teem Destinee
Enlightenment Synthesis Period 6- Team 7
Wylie Period 5 Team 7 Synthesis
As society progressed into the Enlightenment era, it was obvious that the reliance on the upper class and royalty was decreasing. What people had once relied on for protection in a barbaric society no longer seemed to be needed due to civilization. Thus, the progressive thinkers criticized society in a nonconformist perspective. What people had relied on at the Medieval and Renaissance Era no longer applied to the capitalistic European countries that now existed. What the capitalistic society provided economically was the rise of individualism where people’s own wealth relied on themselves. So, reliance upon upper class was not needed but criticized. Many progressive thinkers began to shift their thoughts from the differences of the wealthy and the poor to the similarities. As a result, John Locke wrote that all individuals had the right to life, liberty and property and Voltaire argued that people had the right to choose what they wanted to believe. Writers such as these caused epiphanies to the people regarding their own individual rights and the extent of their government’s power.
Many writers took advantage of this time to criticize the society and the mannerism of the time. William Wycherley writes The Plain Dealer to show how everyone in society is deceitful and two faced. These ideas and method that writers used affected the sensibility of the era.
Wylie Period 5
Team 7
Dan Qi
Samudra Thio
Kevyn Fox
Synthesis Essay Enlightment Period 1 Team 3
Michael Abelev
Hyrum Judkins
Marc Yu
Synthesis Essay
Though the Age of Enlightenment was a time of new ideas and new ways of thinking and considering life and how it should be lived, there were those like in any situation that has their own opinion of the new movement of thinking. Many were in support, and of course, there were those who disagreed. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin, better known by his stage name “Moliere” was a known anti-enlightment activist, but he was just one in the midst of many.
One of the biggest affects the Age of Enlightment had on the the world and Europe in particular was the fact that it was the motiving factor in the start of the French Revolution. The ideology of new rule and new form of government had the people of France in a stur and sparked the eventual revolution. Many who associated themselves with concervative ideas clearly did not agree witht the idea of a revolution, believing the old form of government was the appropriate form of governing in the land. One of the many known anti-revolutionists was Joseph de Maistre who believed that the Revolution and reform of the government would bring nothing but problems to France and the rest of Europe. Edmund Burke wrote the book Reflections on the Revolution in France where he denounced the revolution and the effects it had on the country. Burke and Maistre both belived that the revolution would only bring more problems then it would solve. By hypothetically “whiping the slate clean”, they believed the people of France would only bring about more problems and send the country into a state of turmoil and poverty.
Enlightenment Synthesis Wylie P6 T1
Voltaire changed the way the people looked at religion, mainly Christianity. He believed that a love for God should come from a true, genuine love for him instead of through religious patterns, rules, and routines. Voltaire found it important that a person find their true god by actually loving it without being told or forced to.
Literature was probably the most common form of expressing the values of the Enlightenment era. The ridicule of the wealthy, elite families were satirized in plays, magazines, and books. Because of this, people were able to share and learn from the great men of the Enlightenment era. Their beliefs about the value of an individual was spread and continues to effect our world today.
Jennifer Suh, Harry Yadav, Charles Negrini, Sid Vyas, Sophie Resnick
Wyl.p5.t9 Enlightenment Era Synthesis Question
Wyl.P6.T3 Enlightenment Era
Dylan Mulcahy
Jenny Zhan
Caleb Ong
James Jin
Wylie. Period 1. Team 6. Enlightenment
The Enlightenment era was a period where the importance of the individual was a concept supported by more than just a handful of artists. Philosophers, writers and artists satirized the noble families and how trivial, unimportant and relatively unsuccessful they were in comparison to the individual, experienced, every day man. In Voltaire’s novel, “Zadig”, he satirized the wealthy nobleman and how despite his wealth, he was never really content and paradoxically felt inferior to other people. By making a direct correlation between wealth and lack of happiness, it was easy for even the most amateur of readers to grasp the satire that Voltaire wrote. During this time period, it was crucial that philosophers try to appease the educated as well as the not so educated persons. In Jonathon Swift’s book “Gulliver’s Travels”, he stresses the importance of the individual, satirizing how noble families during the enlightenment period felt superior due to their “strength in numbers” and family connections, when really superiority and the ability to survive lies in the capable hands of the individual. By actually putting a character in a near-death circumstance in a story, one’s superiority and potency is literally put to the test. Gulliver learned that he couldn’t rely on his crew, and needed to think for himself in order to survive. This directly satirizes and correlates with the noble families of the time who couldn’t think for themselves as individuals. In William Hogarth’s collection of six paintings titled, “Marriage a la mode”, he satirizes women and men of the time period, marrying into wealthy families just for the money. He created a series of paintings that begin customary but then completely exaggerate and satirize the concept of arranged marriages to the point where the death of the wife in the last painting is almost funny. He satirizes the families of this period and how there was jealousy and drama that always grew out of proportion. This was ridiculous considering these were noble families who should be concerned more about running countries and leading their people, and not on family drama. This era was certainly a crucial turning point for the everyday man—his voice was becoming heard, and the upper class was becoming outnumbered.
-Team Waka
Lillie Moffett, Lauren Wakabayashi, Nicole Lussier, Sooji Hong
Asher, Period 3, Team 3, Enlightenment Synthesis
The Restoration era, or the era of Enlightenment, was an expansion of the Renaissance, namely, the proliferation of knowledge due to the printing press and the challenges to the corruption of the church. During this era, there were many great philosophers and “great-thinkers” who ridiculed their society at the time in their own way. All of these philosophers were able to mock their society through their books due the invention of the printing press, thus the spreading of their ideology quickened. Who would read these books? The growing middle class would of course, and they would be the educators who would then pass on this knowledge to the lower class. This massive expansion of the middle class during the era meant there was an expansion of the educated and intellectuals. The availability of knowledge to people led to more insightful literature, which led to more knowledge. They read about the insufficiency of their current form of government through philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Charles Montesquieu. Thomas Hobbes felt that having a systematic government was too inadequate and that a single ruler to rule all would be idealistic. His was known simply as the Leviathan, which derived from the biblical Leviathan, talked about how the idea of many sovereign nations could not peacefully exist and will result in constant chaos and warfare due to these nations’ differences in ideology ad belief. So the idea of the Leviathan is that all these sovereign nations would unite as one under a single ruler. Now on the other end of this political ideology spectrum was John Locke and Charles Montesquieu, who both believed in a systematic government. John Locke more or less ridiculed that society at the time lacked individual liberties, which are natural rights given to people by God at birth. His ideas on freedom were so strong that he is referred to as the Father of Liberalism, and he would greatly influence future and upcoming revolutions. He pushed the concepts of personal liberty, religious tolerance, and protection of property. As for Charles Montesquieu, he preached his philosophy of “branched government”, which stated that separating government into branches would create a system of checks and balances. Little did these philosophers know that their mockeries of society would greatly change the world over the next two or three centuries.
Jimmy Don
Haseeb Khan
Yerin Kong
Erik Seetao
Christina Yang
Wylie. P5. T5. Enlightenment
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two philosophers who lived during the Enlightenment Era that had opposing views on human beings and their behavior. Despite their differences, they both agreed on the fact that wealthy family connections and patronages were very shallow and hypocritical. To other artists that did not have this kind of patronage, the wealth of families was a motive for envy and want. John Locke believed in every human being’s right to have “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” He thought that humans were naturally good and that, if left to their own means, humans would thrive in a peaceful environment. Despite these beliefs, he thought that wealthy family patronages were an unfair way to gain advantage in the world of art. Even during the Enlightenment, artists struggled profusely to be successful. But in this case, since the artist has a patronage, the he can just do anything he wants because he will be paid by the wealthy family. Patronages also came with a certain price because they had to always satisfy contributors, otherwise, less people would be willing to donate. The second philosopher was Thomas Hobbes, his view on human beings was the opposite of John Locke’s beliefs about human beings. Hobbes thought that humans were naturally selfish and evil and if given the opportunity, humans would always fight and never agree on anything. Therefore, Thomas Hobbes thought that artists who obtained patronages were just selfish human beings who always looked to gain advantage over other fellow artists. Even though during the previous periods artistic patronage was very sought after, during the Enlightenment, many writers, painters, etc. wanted to demean those who did have a family supporting his works of art.
Enlightenment Era . Asher.p1.t5.
John Locke laid the groundwork for social equality during this era. Believing that each person begins life with ”tabula rasa”, or a clean slate he felt no man should be rewarded nor punished among birth. Born into a prestigious wealthy family and inevitably adopting the status and beliefs of that family is what Locke opposed most. He felt that each individual has his or her own ideas and thoughts rather than acquired values. Locke’s revolutionary idea was the inspiration to many philosophers who alleviated the profile of this time.
Mary Wollstonecraft rebelled against wealth society and demanded equal rights for women. Before the Neoclassical era, women had close to no rights in comparison to men. Mary felt this was wrong due to the fact that men would be nothing without women. For protesting against the upper class, Mary managed to have women overcome sexual discrimination during this time.
Many philosophers believed in making a changing in society and revolted against previous cultures. Such philosopher like John Lock inspired hundreds of intellectuals who later changed, improved, and encouraged even further change.
Asher Group 5 Period 3 Synthesis Question
Enlightenment Synthesis
As technology and modernism approaches the enlightenment era, social hierarchies started to fade away into the darkness. Less people value the importance of elite family connection compared to the earlier time periods like renaissance and medieval, where it was important to the people in every aspect of their life. Many writers, artists, and philosophers in the Restoration Era thought it was consider to be hypocritical and criticize heavily on it.
Multiple philosophers criticize the family connection hierarchies in this age of reasoning expressed through their speeches, books and art works. John Locke was one of many famous philosophers during the era, his philosophy was based off the social contract, which it's a contract involves both government and the people. He believed humans are born good, but the state of nature force man to become selfish and evil through time. Locke heavily criticize on the social hierarchy in the previous time periods, he believed in the nature state all people were equal and independent. Everyone had equal amount of rights and had the natural rights to defend themselves. Famous quote said by John Locke, "All mankind... being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions." Locke didn't believe in monarchy, he tried to advocate the idea separation of power within the government.
Greatest thinkers were born in the Age of Reasoning or the Enlightenment era, ideas were spreading within the society. People like John Locke really affect the society at the time and had a huge impact in the future.
Asher.p3.t4 Enlightenment Synthesis Question
The Enlightenment era, also referred to as the “Age of Reason,” was a cultural movement that spread throughout Europe. Its goal was set to promote the power of reason in order to reform society and advance knowledge. It was during this era that many thinkers expressed their social criticism in hopes that the society would agree and start altering to create a better future.
Voltaire was one of the thinkers that raised his concern about the society and its wrongs. He, for one, supported British Deism and had turned against traditional Christianity as well as Pascal’s Christianity. In short, he believed that only rationalistic natural and moral religion can constitute as a religion. However, he did recognize and appreciate the existence of “God,” because without this figure, morality would not exist and people would act as they please without thinking that there was a greater divine force that would punish any sin. He even said that, “If God did not exist, we must invent God!” Basically, Voltaire portrayed Christianity as a weapon that oppressive tyrants use to defend their own luxurious monarchism; the religion was seen as an inexcusable and ridiculous obstacle of the development of scientific progress.
Another philosopher that was against the society at the time was Rousseau. Interestingly, Rousseau actually rejected the Enlightenment movement because he believed that Reason was also tyranny, and only the return to nature and the revitalization of inner feeling was the correct way to live. He advocated that culture in his world tended to distort the genuine human nature because of its complicated external factors. He opted for a “world of internality” which was much simpler to control and therefore fully explore.
Enlightenment Synthesis
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Asher P3 Team 2 Synthesis
In the Restoration era, writers, philosophers, and artists alike all criticized society for its flawed and distorted values. Most of these thinkers, like Rousseau, and Moliere, attacked high society and the social elite, blaming them for hypocritical elitism, contrary to their philosophical ideologies. One writer, Voltaire, attacked the biggest hypocritical, elitist institution of them all: the church. In Voltaire’s novel Candide, Candide and his mentor encounter several situations, which Voltaire uses to satirize the sacred hypocrisy of the church. One such situation Candide encounters, is the daughter of a pope, who, as a religious leader, and a priest, should be steadfast in celibacy. This, along with many other situations Candide encounters, emphasizes Voltaire’s of the religious hierarchy, although he does not attack the common god-fearing man in the story. Voltaire also goes on to address the ineffectual process of philosophical theorization. This idea is summarized in the novel, “The whole little group entered into this laudable scheme; each one began to exercise his talents. The little plot yielded fine crops… Pangloss sometimes used to say to Candide: —All events are linked together in the best of possible worlds; for, after all, if you had not been driven from a fine castle by being kicked in the backside for love of Miss Cunégonde, if you hadn’t been sent before the Inquisition… if you hadn’t lost all your sheep from the good land of Eldorado, you wouldn’t be sitting here eating candied citron and pistachios. —That is very well put, said Candide, but we must go and work our garden.” Voltaire uses this image as a way to criticize the philosophical speculation and intellectual posturing that was common of elite society types. If everyone works, there is no time for useless musings that serve no one, and everyone is happy and fruitful as a result. In this way Voltaire uses Candide to examine the current state of his society, and ultimately concludes that he and everyone else would be better off working.